Local Futures

  • Home
  • Media room
  • Blog
  • Store
  • Contact

The Economics of Happiness

Donate
Menu
  • About us
    • Local Futures
    • Our team
    • Founder, Helena Norberg-Hodge
    • Get involved
    • Our history
    • Close
  • Projects
    • Connect globally and locally
      • World Localization Day
      • Voices from the Field
      • Localization Action Guide
      • International Alliance for Localization
        • Join the IAL
        • IAL members
          • IAL member organizations
          • IAL Listserv
      • Ladakh Project
      • Planet Local
        • Culture
        • Eco Communities
        • Ecology
        • Health
        • Local Business & Finance
        • Local Energy
        • Local Food, Farming & Fisheries
        • Local Policy & Community Rights
        • Place-based Education
        • Sharing & Repairing
    • Gain a big picture perspective
      • Blog
      • Local Futures Podcast
        • Jeremy Lent: Shifting Paradigms
        • COP, carbon and high-tech: who is setting the agenda?
        • Beyond Conspiracy: Framing Meaningful Activism
        • Unpacking Global Empire from an Indigenous Perspective
        • More than Just the Vegetables
        • Food Sovereignty in the Global Economy
        • Transition, Tradition, and Trade
        • Not-for-Profit Businesses
        • Love, Values, and Wellbeing Economies
        • Growing a Farmers Market from the Ground Up
        • Beautiful Places: A Conversation with Wendell Berry
        • Creating the Framework for a New Economy
        • From GDP to GNH
        • Rebuilding Healthy Communities: The Growing Ecovillage Movement
        • Seeds of Resilience, Seeds of Sovereignty
        • Why Local Ownership Matters
        • Local Alternatives to Globalized Development: A View from India
        • How to Feed the World? A Political Agroecological Approach
        • Helena Norberg-Hodge on how corporate ‘free trade’ deals threaten local communities and economies worldwide
      • Webinars
        • Sacred Activism in a Post-Trump World Webinar
        • Talking Climate Webinar
        • People Power: Democracy and the Economy Webinar
        • Beyond Trump: The Path to Real Change Webinar
        • Bringing the Food Economy Home Webinar
        • A World Without ‘Free’ Trade: What it would look like and how to get there
        • Beyond ‘Free Trade’ – Alternatives to Corporate Rule
        • Education: Promises, Myths & Realities Webinar
        • Debt and Speculation in the Global Economy Webinar
        • A New Activism Webinar
        • Climate Change or System Change Webinar
        • Going Local Webinar
      • Powerful talks
      • The Economics of Happiness film
      • Films and short videos
      • Books and reports
    • Close
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • World Localization Day
    • Economics of Happiness conferences
    • Other past events
    • Close
  • Action resources
    • Getting the facts
      • Globalization – drivers and impacts
      • Localization – a solution-multiplier
      • Big Picture Activism – rethinking basic assumptions
    • Action tools
      • Localization Action Guide
      • Covid-19 response: let’s localize like never before
      • Maps of alternatives
      • Organizations for change
      • Independent media sources
      • Films for change
      • Recommended readings
    • Close
  • Books, reports & videos
    • Books and reports
      • Local is Our Future
        • Endorsements for Local is Our Future
        • Translations of Local is Our Future
      • Ancient Futures
      • Free reads
      • Translated resources
      • Annual reports
    • Films and short videos
      • PLANET LOCAL : A Quiet Revolution
      • LOCAL: A Story of Hope
      • Local Food Can Save The World
      • Going Local: the solution-multiplier
      • Insane Trade!
      • The Economics of Happiness
      • Ancient Futures
    • Close
You are here: Home / Energy / The dirty truth about clean energy

The dirty truth about clean energy

May 25, 2022 by Carlos Zorrilla 9 Comments

Blog 'The dirty truth about clean energy' by Carlos Zorillo - Local Futures
Everyone knows what needs to be done to bring down CO2 levels; pump less of it into the atmosphere. But instead of reducing overall energy consumption, the focus is on increasing ‘green’ energy consumption: electric vehicles, massive electric storage installations, solar ‘farms’ and monster wind turbines. More consumption to cure the cancer of overconsumption. Ah, yes, and tree planting. Anything but serious reduction of fossil fuel consumption.

The voices calling for careful considerations of the impacts of a transition to ‘clean’ energy are drowned by the misplaced optimism of a green future. Few are asking commonsense questions that, if not answered now could easily create a worse environmental disaster later – and even compound the climate crisis. The elephant in the room few want to acknowledge is the destruction of people and the environment that will result from the hunger for so-called green energy minerals – mainly copper, cobalt, nickel and lithium.

Because of the growing demand and consequent high prices for these materials, mining companies will end up operating mega-mines in places that would otherwise be politically, environmentally, socially and/or economically unwise. These include ecologically fragile sites, biodiversity hotspots, indigenous territories, and politically unstable countries.

Some mines will deforest thousands of hectares and contaminate water resources with heavy metals. Deforestation, especially in tropical countries, will significantly reduce the Earth’s biodiversity. While the resolution adopted at the COP 26 to stop deforestation by 2030 will help somewhat, 10 more years of deforestation will bring us closer to several tipping points regarding climate, and will irremediably reduce biodiversity. Lost species cannot be brought back in 10, or 100 years’ time. Once they are extinct they are gone forever.

The biodiversity crisis, it’s worth mentioning, is considered almost as critical as the climate crisis – and the two are intimately interrelated. Climate change is leading to loss of biodiversity; meanwhile, loss of biodiversity makes ecosystems less resilient, and less able to absorb CO2… and we all know what follows.

The environmental degradation that accompanies mining will affect other key ecosystem services, such as purifying air and water, regulating stream and river flows, and reducing erosion and flooding. These and dozens more ecosystem services are critically endangered. If we act now, we can at least try to limit the most damaging of the impacts.

Then there are the human rights violations that are so closely tied to mining. Many communities, whether indigenous or campesino, will not agree to relocate willingly. Besides violating fundamental human rights, forced relocation upsets all facets of communal and personal life, identity, livelihoods and connection with the land. And, given the amount of mining for metals needed to feed the so-called “clean energy transition”, forced relocation will be part and parcel of any such transition.

Materials

According to an International Energy Agency (IEA) report, in order to “hit net-zero globally by 2050, would require six times more mineral inputs in 2040 than today” (emphasis in the original).

The minerals considered by the IEA report are copper, nickel, cobalt and lithium, as well as graphite and rare earths. They are sometimes referred to as the ‘critical minerals’. Given the power and greed of the fossil fuel barons and the relative failure of COP26, it is extremely unlikely the world will reach net zero emissions by 2050. But even a less optimistic scenario still calls for a quadrupling of mineral inputs from today’s levels. That’s one hell of an increase in a relatively short time – especially when considering the social, cultural and environmental impacts mineral extraction is having right now. 

Questions to ask

Following are just some of the questions we should be asking ourselves in order to avoid deepening the environmental crisis:

  • Where will those minerals come from?
  • Are there enough of these metals in the world to make sure that not only the wealthy citizens of the North will reap the benefits from them?
  • What will be the social, cultural and environmental impacts of extracting and processing these metals?
  • What steps can be taken to assure that the rights of local communities are not violated, and that they don’t end up paying the costs of producing these minerals?
  • What will happen if we create an even bigger environmental crisis while trying to fix the climate crisis? And what can we do now to avoid that scenario?

Perspective

It is understandably hard to grasp the amount of land and materials that a ‘green energy’ transition will entail. Sixty-seven tons of pure copper goes into each medium-sized off-shore wind turbine. Similarly, a plug-in electric vehicle needs 2 to 4 times more copper than the standard internal combustion vehicle. The battery in that same electric vehicle uses as much lithium as 10,000 smartphone batteries. Meanwhile, energy storage installations will need to increase capacity by more than 20 times current levels.

Nickel is another essential component of vehicle batteries, and its production is particularly destructive. For example the contamination generated by the Norlisk nickel mine and processing plant in Russia’s Artic region has devastated at least 350,000 hectares of forests.

Though most lithium deposits are not usually located deep underground, operations to extract it can dry up aquifers, affect communities’ access to water, and lower its quality. Lithium operations use an inordinate amount of water. In some cases, up to 500,000 gallons to produce just one ton of lithium.

Cobalt, another essential car battery component, has its own horrific dark side (see below).

In its analysis of the mineral needs for a net-zero future, the IEA did not include non-mineral materials. Balsa wood is one of these. Because of its light weight, it is highly coveted for the blades in giant wind turbines. Even though ‘balsa fever’ has only recently been an issue, it is already causing social and environmental problems in the Amazon.

A matter of scale

Most people don’t have the slightest idea of the impacts of large-scale mining. A single such mining project can easily impact thousands of hectares of land – land that can be covered in primary tropical forest harboring dozens of endangered species of animals and plants, as well as protecting key watersheds, and mitigating the effects of climate change. The same forested land could also be a major or potential tourist draw and provide drinking water to thousands. It could also be the source of food, fiber, medicines and building materials for local communities, and be held sacred by local populations.

Because of decreasing metal content found in most metal ores, which in the case of copper can be less than 0.5% (1,000 kg of ore yields 5 kg of pure copper), the environmental impacts are hard to imagine. In the case of the La Escondida copper mine in Chile’s Atacama desert, the tailings pond alone – which is used to store toxic waste from copper processing – measures 5,500 hectares (13,375 acres). The dams holding the tailings ponds are prone to collapse, and when they do they annihilate everything in their path. In 2019, for example, the collapse of the tailings dam at Samarco mining operations, owned by Brazilian company Vale, killed 270 Brazilians and devasted the river system in the vicinity of the town of Brumadinho. Four years earlier, a similar disaster killed 19 locals and wiped out the town of Bento Rodrigues, creating the worst environmental disaster in Brazil’s history. The toxic sludge reached the Atlantic Ocean, 660 kilometers away. Experts say it could take decades for the river system to recover, if at all. The mine was co-owed by BHP Billiton, the world’s largest mining corporation.

The dirty truth about clean energy metals

The low metal content in ores is accompanied by natural occurring contaminants. Heavy metals, like lead, arsenic and cadmium are almost invariably found alongside copper. Nickel ores are likewise contaminated with heavy metals.

Then there is the issue of scale. The largest open-pit operations can move almost one million tons of material (both ore and waste) per day. They do this 365 days a year. To break up the hard rock that these metals are found in, as well as to access the metals, millions of pounds of explosives are used. The Bingham Canyon copper mine in Utah, for example, uses 1,000 tons of explosives per day. And the deeper the miners have to go to access the metals, the more dire the environmental impacts.

Diesel is a key component of the most common blasting material, and the trucks that haul ore and waste can consume thousands of liters of diesel per day to transport the broken up mineralized subsoil to the surface for milling. And this is only for the extraction phase: the refining of metals like copper consume much more energy than the actual extraction. For these reasons, companies are reluctant to release their product’s real CO2 footprint, nor the amount of toxic substances dumped into the environment.

One could sum up the situation regarding mining and ‘green metals’ in one simple phrase from a 2020 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development report:  “Most consumers are only aware of the ‘clean’ aspects of electric vehicles,” says Pamela Coke-Hamilton, UNCTAD’s director of international trade. “The dirty aspects of the production process are out of sight.”

The dirty truth of clean energy by Carlos Zorillo - Local Futures - iea-chart-minerals-used-in-electric-cars-compared-to-conventional-carsMining and Poverty

Then there is the issue of poverty. Mining for colbalt in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has not only created environmental disasters, but also fueled violent armed groups and debilitating corruption. The country, in spite of being rich in mineral resources, including cobalt and copper, is one of the world’s poorest.

Cases like that of the DRG, and Zaire, two important copper exporters, highlight a well-known curse associated with the dependence of developing countries on exporting raw minerals to rich ones. Niger, exporter of uranium, and Ghana exporter of gold, are both affected by high rates of poverty, just one aspect of the phenomenon that has come to be known as the natural resource curse: countries rich in natural resources are often afflicted by poverty, corruption, authoritarian governments, and violent conflict.

African nations are not alone in this. Bolivia, which has for centuries enriched other countries with its tin and silver, is still plagued by endemic poverty (and it has now opened itself up to lithium investments). Meanwhile, the some of the poorest Mexican municipalities are precisely where most gold mines are located. The same applies to the mining provinces in Peru.

These are the countries and sites that many companies had avoided because of political instability.  But with demand for green energy metals raising their price, corporations are now willing to consider them as investment opportunities.

One deeply troubling aspect of the new green metal rush is that the miners and governments will keep going out of their way to avoid correctly valuing the other types of wealth within a mining concession, including the value that ecosystem services provide local communities and the world. Some of these are mentioned above, and include erosion prevention, regulating stream flows, biodiversity conservation, and ironically, mitigating the effects of climate change.

There is a reason for such perversity. For if mining companies were forced to put a real price tag on ecosystem services and all other kinds of wealth within a proposed mining project that would be negatively affected, the balance would be invariably tilt in favor of protecting these areas. As you can imagine, this kind of information is the last thing that mining companies and the buyers of their ‘green energy metals’ want to acknowledge, at least publicly

Getting Real

There is a real possibility that what I am presenting will be seen as alarmist and exaggerated. Let me bring it all home by using an example not too distant from where I live, the Intag region of northwest Ecuador. Approximately 15 kilometers away as the parrot flies, several transnational mining corporations have been trying to develop a large-scale open pit copper mine. The Llurimagua mining concession is within the Tropical Andes, the most diverse of the world’s Biodiversity Hotspots. It is covered in primary cloud forests, which not only protect dozens of species of animals facing extinction, but also 43 sources of rivers and streams.

Amazon Cloud Forest - Photo by Carlos ZorillaAll of this is in one mining concession of less than 5,000 hectares (12,500 acres). Some animals that make their home in the orchid-rich forest are critically endangered. These include a fish species and three frogs, two of which have been reported nowhere else on the planet. Several primates who live here are also on the list of endangered species, including the Brown-headed Spider Monkey, one of the most threatened primates in the world. Pumas, ocelots, and the Andean bear are likewise inhabitants of this biodiverse wonderland.

A 1990’s preliminary environmental impact study prepared by experts for a small copper mine in this area predicted that the mining operations would deforest so much land that the local climate would dry up. The study also predicted contamination of rivers with lead, arsenic, chromium and cadmium. Four communities would have to be relocated to make room for the mine and its accompanying infrastructure. The study did not analyze the impact to thousands of farmers who depend on rain for their livelihood.

Then, the following year, the company inferred that the copper deposit could be five times larger. In 2018, Codelco reported that the Llurimagua copper deposit could even be much, much larger. The Llurimagua area is not, by any means, unique.

These are precisely the biological and cultural jewels and human rights that the growing demand for green metals is putting at risk. Companies know this, and are taking steps to insulate themselves from the loss of reputation that will come from producing or buying metals from these sites. It is what is motivating mining corporations and the buyers of their products, including car manufacturers, to join organizations that will supply them with certificates of compliance with social and environmental standards. Instead of certifying the companies, the organizations certify individual mines, which means a company can sell its reputation based on one mine, but produce and sell dirty metals from the rest of its portfolio. Currently, there are dozens of these greenwashing outfits. Keep tuned because more are bound to sprout up in the coming months and years.

The main objective of this text is not to be alarmist, nor to prevent an energy transition. It is to draw attention to its peril and consequences. And, to motivate a serious discussion in order to avoid the impacts to people and the environment briefly detailed above.

The most important measures to take right now are to create red lines with local stakeholders in order to keep mining and other extractive industries out of these special sites. One of the most important is respecting the right of local populations to decide their own future. Consultations need to be genuine, and if consent is given for extractive activities, it needs to be done freely, without pressure and only after thoroughly knowing the proposed activities’ impacts. Sacred lands, biodiversity hotspots, native forests and habitats harboring endangered species must be off-limits to mining. Given that mining can contaminate water in perpetuity, projects that pose a risk of contaminating water sources with heavy metals or cancerous substances must be strictly prohibited. Mining too, has no place in the world’s seabeds or the Artic. These are just some of the no-go sites that governments must exclude from mining if we are not to aggravate the existing environmental crisis and create new ones.

More than enough damage has been done to cultures, species and whole ecosystems sacrificing them in the name of economic development. Now it is being done in the name of the clean energy transition. A transition that will be anything but clean if the materials come from these special places.

Isn’t that the same mentality that got us where we are today?

 

Top photo: Sungun copper mine, Fars Media Corporation, CC BY 4.0

Bottom photo: Intag cloud forests, Carlos Zorrilla

An earlier version of this post appeared as Carlos Zorrilla’s Medium post under the title “Can We Avoid Creating a Worse Environmental Crisis While Trying to Solve the Climate One?”

 

 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Related

Pandemic Blues
The food shortage solution in your backyard

Filed Under: Energy, Environment, Nature Tagged With: climate change, corporations, development, indigenous, pollution, renewable energy

Author: Carlos Zorrilla

The dirty truth about clean energy by Carlos Zorrilla - Local Futures

Carlos Zorrilla is an environmental activist, farmer, photographer, and writer. He lives in the Intag region of Ecuador.

Comments

  1. Shaun Browne says

    May 25, 2022 at 8:23 am

    If I read this article correctly, I am much better off if I:
    1. Keep, maintain, and limit the use of my petroleum powered car, thereby reducing emissions, eliminating use of rare earth materials, and reducing the need for electric vehicle infrastructure.
    2. Continue to live in neighbourhoods where cars are not required, for any reason, including weekly visits to the grocery store.
    3. Search for, utilize, and celebrate every non-battery powered innovation, for transportation, including walking, cycling, car sharing, or other alternatives.

    We have enjoyed this lifestyle for 26 years now, and will continue to do so.

    Reply
  2. Carolyn Emms says

    May 25, 2022 at 8:50 am

    We are Rainforest Reserves Australia and we are witnessing first hand the desecration of North Queensland’s highest biodiversity of State National and global significance. These projects, Australia’s greatest assets are adjacent to Wet Tropics World Heritage Parks, Catchment areas of the Great Barrier Reef and on the Great Dividing range. Cultural Heritage will disappear and our priceless wildlife including the Greater Gliders and Koalas are looking down the barrel of extinction. We are only a little organisation and including the wider community including the Jirrbal custodians are being trampled. We’ve held 5 events and no one wants this. 81 new proposals just discovered! They take our money, extract and exploit. It’s unconscionable.

    Reply
  3. ed says

    May 26, 2022 at 1:10 am

    excellent exposure of the ‘green energy utopia’
    as idiotically dancing on a Yellow Gold Brick road to the
    Magical Emerald Electric City…just Over the Rainbow….
    The source of our problem is Consumption by all of Us wastrel consumers–
    -not fantastic dreams of ‘free’ energy sources……
    in short—-realizing that
    ‘We—silly Munchkins all– have met the Enemy…..and it is…..Us.’

    Reply
  4. Eberhard Wolff says

    May 29, 2022 at 4:49 am

    A todos estos problemas relacionados con el auto eléctrico y las energías verdes, se sumará el problema energético de grandes dimensiones . Los vehículos terrestres que consumen Diesel y gasolina, requieren por ejemplo en Alemania más energía que se produce de energía eléctrica en todo el país para el mismo periodo. No hay modo de generar tal cantidad de energía con renovables durante esta década, ni durante la siguiente. Un número para Alemania es de cerca de 500 Terawatthoras para 2021, generadas con centrales hidráulicas, termoeléctricas, nucleares etc.. La única solución es, como bien se dijo, reducir drásticamente el uso de los vehículos, tanto terrestres, marítimos y aéreos. Y debemos empezar ya – lo debemos a nuestros hijos, porque las generaciones posguerra somos las que originamos este desastre climático.

    Reply
  5. Deborah Andrew says

    May 31, 2022 at 5:00 am

    I am incredibly encouraged by this and the previous article. Knowing that those who have followed Local Futures are now learning the truth about ‘clean energy’ and ‘renewables’ that are not renewable or benign gives me hope.

    Added reading/viewing: “Green Illusions, The Dirty Secrets of Clean Energy and the Futures of Environmentalism” by Ozzie Zehner (he has co-produced two films with Michael Moore on the subject). ‘Bright Green Lies” by Derrik Jensen. Others have written as well. But the public is unaware of the facts and when I have shared an annotated list with officials, I get no response. A tragedy in the making. Perhaps this will be the slight shift needed for a new understanding of what would be wise responses, locally.

    Reply
  6. Len says

    May 31, 2022 at 10:45 am

    Astonishing that your article is based on a report by the IEA, an organisation run by corporations and fossil fuel magnates. The study you refer to is clearly biased in favour of ICE cars, exactly what the oil companies want us to use. The stats given are unsourced without references to any studies, let alone peer review studies. It’s interesting to see that so many blogs like yours are jumping on the bandwagon of destructive mining, a perspective driven by the fossil fuel companies who are happy to demonise any form of mining other than coal, gas and oil, assume that no recycling is or will be done, and that all the batteries that will be running our electric future will be made from the same components as those of today. The biggest elephant in the room is overpopulation, a subject that seems to be taboo. Do you drive an ICE car? Do you fly? Do you heat your home with fossil fuels?

    Reply
    • Carlos Zorrilla says

      June 6, 2022 at 9:20 am

      Hmmm,,,

      Reread as unbiased as possible and get back to me. I do not own a car, do not believe gas-powered vehicles are the answer, but a worse response is more consumption of very limited resources which will compound the climate crisis. Perhaps I was not clear enough.

      I say earmark the mineral resources to replace all coal and diesel-powered electric generations and all fossil fueled mass transit, and then, and ONLY THEN, direct them to private vehicles. But all the car manufacturers know there won’t be enough minerals left over if this plan is implemented.

      Directing the scarce key minerals to private vehicles is incredibly unethical at this stage, and will only make a small dent in reducing the carbon footprint of our insane species.

      Reply
  7. Jacqueline van Heerden says

    May 31, 2022 at 4:35 pm

    Thank you for this information – most valuable – will write about it in my next local newspaper article. So good to have this information out there. Thank you for what you are doing.

    Reply
  8. Lee says

    July 4, 2022 at 8:14 pm

    Hopefully the world will eventually wake up. Green energy will not solve the problems, we need to reduce our consumption of all resources. Manufacturing electric vehicles requires as many resources as petrol ones. The popular environmental movement is somehow convincing people that simply changing to ‘green’ energy will solve our problems, as they know well that telling people to return to a basic lifestyle won’t win them any supporters. Well done for trying to unveil the truth.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept the Privacy Policy

Subscribe to the Economics of Happiness Blog

Sign up for our email updates

Latest Blogs

  • Can small-scale farmers feed the world?

    August 16, 20221 Comment
  • Of George Monbiot, mathematical modernism and the case for agrarian localism

    August 3, 20222 Comments
  • The Gospel of Progress

    July 20, 20221 Comment
  • Lurching from food crisis to food crisis

    July 8, 2022No Comments
  • The food shortage solution in your backyard

    June 15, 20221 Comment
  • Supply chain failures: another reason for localized economies

    June 8, 20221 Comment

Blog posts by Category

  • Capitalism (10)
  • Cities (2)
  • Climate Change (55)
  • Community (32)
  • Consumerism (6)
  • Coronavirus (19)
  • Democracy (4)
  • Development (24)
  • Economic Growth and Degrowth (34)
  • Economics of Happiness Conferences (4)
  • Education (9)
  • Energy (3)
  • Environment (45)
  • Food and Farming (72)
  • Free Trade and Globalization (45)
  • Happiness (5)
  • Health (27)
  • Indigenous worldview (16)
  • Inequality (7)
  • Inner transformation (16)
  • Livelihoods and jobs (38)
  • Local energy (9)
  • Local finance (5)
  • Local food (15)
  • Localization (56)
  • Nature (6)
  • New economy (20)
  • Resistance and Renewal (18)
  • Technology (39)
  • The Economics of Happiness (17)
  • Transportation (2)
  • Uncategorized (4)
  • War (2)

Local Futures Logo
About us
Contact
Get involved
Privacy policy

Projects
The Economics of Happiness film
Events
Action resources
Books, reports and videos
Blog
Store

Sign up for our email update

Donate

Local Futures © Copyright 2022 | site by digiflip
 

Loading Comments...