Local Futures

  • Home
  • Media Room
  • Blog
  • Store
  • Contact

The Economics of Happiness

Donate
Menu
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Founder Helena Norberg-Hodge
    • Our History
    • Close
  • Our Projects
    • Global to Local
      • International Alliance for Localization (IAL)
        • Join the IAL
        • IAL Members
          • IAL Member Organizations
          • IAL Listserv
        • Video Project: Voices from the IAL
      • Webinar Recordings
        • Sacred Activism in a Post-Trump World Webinar
        • Talking Climate Webinar
        • People Power: Democracy and the Economy Webinar
        • Beyond Trump: The Path to Real Change Webinar
        • Bringing the Food Economy Home Webinar
        • A World Without ‘Free’ Trade: What it would look like and how to get there
        • Beyond ‘Free Trade’ – Alternatives to Corporate Rule
        • Education: Promises, Myths & Realities Webinar
        • Debt and Speculation in the Global Economy Webinar
        • A New Activism Webinar
        • Climate Change or System Change Webinar
        • Going Local Webinar
      • Animation: Going Local: the solution-multiplier
      • Insane Trade Short Film and Factsheet
        • Insane Trade! & Factsheet Translated
      • Planet Local
        • Culture
        • Eco Communities
        • Ecology
        • Health
        • Local Business & Finance
        • Local Energy
        • Local Food, Farming & Fisheries
        • Local Policy & Community Rights
        • Place-based Education
        • Sharing & Repairing
        • Planet Local Short Film Series
          • 1 – Introduction: The New Local Food Movement
          • 2 – Diverse Farming Systems
          • 3 – Local Food Webs: Exploring Systems of Distribution
          • 4 – Local Food Processors: AKA Making Delicious Food
          • 5 – Challenges & Solutions
          • 6 – Ecovillages & Networks for New Farmers
          • 7 – And Finally… Here’s a Little More Inspiration
      • Local Bites Podcast
        • Unpacking Global Empire from an Indigenous Perspective with Tyson Yunkaporta & Helena Norberg-Hodge
        • More than Just the Vegetables
        • Food Sovereignty in the Global Economy
        • Transition, Tradition, and Trade
        • Not-for-Profit Businesses
        • Love, Values, and Wellbeing Economies
        • Growing a Farmers Market from the Ground Up
        • Beautiful Places: A Conversation with Wendell Berry
        • Creating the Framework for a New Economy
        • From GDP to GNH
        • Rebuilding Healthy Communities: The Growing Ecovillage Movement
        • Seeds of Resilience, Seeds of Sovereignty
        • Why Local Ownership Matters
        • Local Alternatives to Globalized Development: A View from India
        • How to Feed the World? A Political Agroecological Approach
        • Helena Norberg-Hodge on how corporate ‘free trade’ deals threaten local communities and economies worldwide
    • Our Work in Ladakh
      • Past Work in Ladakh
        • Experiences in Ladakh 2018
        • Experiences in Ladakh 2017
      • Ancient Futures (book & film)
      • Local Futures’ History in Ladakh
        • Women’s Alliance of Ladakh
    • The Economics of Happiness
      • Economics of Happiness Conferences
      • The Film
      • DIY Economics of Happiness Workshop
    • Close
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
      • Full Events Calendar
    • Economics of Happiness Conferences
      • Past International Conferences
      • Other Past Events
    • Calendar
        • « January 2021 » loading...
          M T W T F S S
          28
          29
          30
          31
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          12
          13
          14
          15
          16
          17
          18
          19
          20
          21
          22
          23
          24
          25
          26
          27
          28
          29
          30
          31
    • Close
  • Learn & Take Action
    • Learn About Our Work
      • Learn about Globalization
      • Learn about Localization
      • Learn about Big Picture Activism
    • Get Involved
      • How to donate
      • Join email list
      • Host a Community Screening
      • Volunteer or Intern
    • Activist Tools
      • COVID-19 Response: Let’s Localize Like Never Before
      • What You Can Do To Localize Right Now
      • Films for Change
      • Recommended Readings
      • Organizations for Change
      • Independent Media Sources
      • Maps of Alternatives
    • Close
  • Publications
    • Local is Our Future (latest book)
      • Endorsements for Local is Our Future
      • Translations of Local is Our Future
    • Ancient Futures (book & film)
    • The Economics of Happiness (film)
    • Translated Resources
    • Free Reading Materials
    • Films
    • Books & Other Publications
    • Newsletters & Annual Reports
    • Close
You are here: Home / Climate Change / Why the “Anthropocene” is not “Climate Change”

Why the “Anthropocene” is not “Climate Change”

February 6, 2019 by Julia Adeney Thomas 5 Comments

“Anthropocene” is a widely proposed name for the geological epoch that covers human impact on our planet. But it is not synonymous with “climate change,” nor can it covered by “environmental problems.” Bigger and more shocking, the Anthropocene encapsulates the evidence that human pressures became so profound around the middle of the 20th century that we blew a planetary gasket. Hello, new Earth System. Hello, Anthropocene.

The phrase “Earth System” refers to the entirety of our planet’s interacting physical, chemical, biological, and human processes. Enabled by new data-collecting technologies like satellites and ever more powerful computer modeling, Earth System science reframes how we understand our planet. Climate is just one element of this system; if we focus on that alone, we will misunderstand the complexity of the danger. The term “environment” helps us understand ourselves as part of ecosystems, but fails to capture the newness of our current situation. We have always lived in the environment; only very recently, just as Asia began its skyrocketing development, did we begin living in the altered Earth System of the Anthropocene.

The Anthropocene Requires a New Way of Thinking

The Anthropocene is a multidimensional challenge. Our future is more unpredictable than ever, with new phenomena like Category 5 megastorms, rapid species extinction, and the loss of polar ice. This change is irreversible. NASA says that levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) are higher than they have been at any time in the past 400,000 years—well before our species evolved—causing the atmosphere to warm.

The climate has certainly changed, but so too have other aspects of the planetary system. Take the lithosphere: 193,000 human-made “inorganic crystalline compounds,” or what you and I might call “rocks,” now vastly outnumber Earth’s ~5,000 natural minerals, while 8.3 billion tons of plastics coat the land, water, and our internal organs. Due to modern agribusiness techniques, so much topsoil is washing away that England has only about 60 more harvests left.

The biosphere is equally altered. Never has the planet been so crowded with human beings. In 1900, there were around 1.5 billion of us; in the 1960s, around 3 billion; today there are upwards of 7.4 billion. Human beings and our domesticated animals comprise an astounding 97% of the total zoomass of terrestrial mammals, meaning that wild creatures make up a miserly 3%. Humans and our companion species occupy considerably more than half of the planet’s habitable land surface. Concerning the hydrosphere, fresh water renews itself at the rate of about 1% a year, but currently 21 out of 37 of the world’s major aquifers are being drawn down faster—in some cases much faster—than they can be replenished.

The planet’s chemistry has changed too. Warmer oceans interfere with the production of oxygen by phytoplankton, and some scientists predict that with a rise of 6oC—which could happen as soon as 2100—this oxygen production could cease. Our production of fixed nitrogen is five times higher than it was 60 years ago; in fact, Earth has never had so much fixed nitrogen in its entire ~4.5-billion-year history. Since World War II, synthetic chemical production has increased more than thirtyfold. Of the more than 80,000 new chemicals, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has tested only about 200 for human health risks.

Alarming as each factor is on its own, the concept of the Anthropocene brings all these factors and others together. This is the only way that we can understand Earth as a single reverberating system with feedback loops and tipping points that we can’t yet predict.

The Anthropocene’s interrelated systematicity presents not a problem, but a multidimensional predicament. A problem might be solved, often with a single technological tool produced by experts in a single field, but a predicament presents a challenging condition requiring resources and ideas of many kinds. We don’t solve predicaments; instead, we navigate through them. Collaboration among scientists, policymakers, social scientists, humanists, and community leaders is key to contending with the Anthropocene. Technology is important, but the hardest challenges will be about how to alter our political and economic systems. Even the United Nations’ US$24 million Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) concluded that our current systems are not up to the task: we need “significant changes in policies, institutions and practices that are not currently under way.”

The Danger of the One-Dimensional Thinking of Climate Change

So, are the techno-optimists, who believe most world problems can be solved by innovation, wrong? The answer to this question is that they are not so much wrong as misguided, addressing a narrow issue in the narrowest terms. Most begin by gesturing toward the totality of environmental problems, but end by focusing on climate change alone. Sometimes climate change is further reduced to CO2 emissions to the exclusion of all other greenhouse gases, such as methane.

A favorite example of techno-optimists like economist Jeffrey Sachs is substituting wind power for fossil fuels. Like others, he speaks in confident tones about “decoupling” economic growth from natural resources, contending that “growth can continue while pressures on key resources (water, air, land, habitats of other species) and pollution are significantly reduced rather than increased,” by means of new technologies and market pricing. In short, we can provide for the growing human population (expected to hit 8 billion in 2023) without destroying the ecosystem, without impoverishing future generations, and without bothering to transform our political and economic systems. The status quo is fine if we tighten a few nuts and bolts. Let us look at this techno-optimism from the Anthropocene perspective.

Most industrial-scale wind turbines require rare earth metals sourced from China, which supplies about 90% of the world’s demand and has a monopoly on some elements. Not only are the mines of China’s primary production site, the southeastern province of Jiangxi, being rapidly depleted, but such mining entails shocking environmental and social costs. According to investigative journalist Liu Hongqiao, “Research has found that producing one ton of rare earth ore (in terms of rare earth oxides) produces 200 cubic meters of acidic wastewater. The production of the rare earths needed to meet China’s demand for wind turbines up to 2050 … will result in the release of 80 million cubic meters of wastewater.” Once obtained, this ore must be transported and processed to make turbines. These turbines, once positioned, require maintenance, using more resources. Ultimately, though, they will end up as refuse, more trash on our trash-filled planet. There is nothing dematerialized or carbon-free about wind turbines if we look at the total picture.

Reducing our problem to climate change, then to CO2, and finally to measuring emissions only at the point of energy production is a dramatic misrepresentation of our dilemma. An Anthropocene perspective is needed to keep the totality of the predicament in view.

Slowing climate change is crucial but navigating its challenges is only possible if it is understood as one facet of planetary overshoot. The challenges of our altered, unpredictable Earth System cannot be met by technological tinkering within the very systems that pushed it over the edge in the first place. There’s nothing for it but to roll up our sleeves and begin the hard work of transforming our political and economic systems with the aims of decency and resilience.

 

This essay originally appeared in AsiaGlobal Online.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Related

Education, jobs and capitalism
How bad is global inequality, really?

Filed Under: Climate Change, Economic Growth and Degrowth, Environment, Technology Tagged With: climate change, economic growth, economics, farming, industrial agriculture, sustainability, systems thinking, technology

Author: Julia Adeney Thomas

Julia Adeney Thomas is an associate professor in the Department of History at the University of Notre Dame, USA. She has written extensively on issues of nature, politics, and the environment. Currently, with geologists Jan Zalasiewicz and Mark Williams of the Anthropocene Working Group, she is completing "The Anthropocene" for Polity Press.

Comments

  1. Peter Strous says

    February 25, 2019 at 1:13 pm

    Re: “most world problems can be solved by technological innovation”

    Our main problems are Human health, Animal health, Planetarian health, Overpopulation, running out of resources and the threat of WWIII. All of these have a strong social aspect to them or are caused by unsocial behaviour.

    From this it flows that we do not need technological innovation to solve our issues but we need SOCIAL INVESTMENTS, i.e. people time and money aiming at more human cooperation and sustainability. There will be plenty of that coming up with the unemployment explosion that is to come. We just need to guide it all in the right direction. Peter Strous – [email protected]

    Reply
  2. Ken says

    March 16, 2019 at 6:37 am

    Geoengineering is the primary cause of climate change, a.k.a., chem trails, it has already been proven. See GeoengineeringWatch.org and get all the facts and proof. Also,,,LOOK up!!! Can’t deny that kind of proof…

    Reply
  3. LESLIE SKLAIR says

    March 16, 2019 at 8:34 pm

    EXCELLENT, CLIMATE CHANGE HAS BECOME A METONYM (PART FOR THE WHOLE) FOR THE ANTHROPOCENE AND WE NEED TO ASK WHY THIS HAS HAPPENED AND WHOSE INTERESTS IT SERVES. I AM DOING RESEARCH ON HOW THE ANTHROPOCENE IS BEING REPRESENTED IN MASS MEDIA ALL OVER THE WORLD AND COMING TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE SACHS ARGUMENT YOU DISMANTLE IN THIS ARTICLE IS A DOMINANT ANTHROPOCENE NARRATIVE. THIS MORPHS INTO THE ‘GOOD’ ANTHROPOCENE.

    Reply
  4. jyama says

    April 20, 2019 at 2:06 pm

    Very articulate piece. Except for the optimism in the last sentence. We are in overshoot. There will be less and less decency and resilience as we descend into frustration and cognitive dissonance.

    Reply
  5. Ipiso Junior Ipiso says

    March 23, 2020 at 4:23 pm

    The questions is, do we really need all this technological development for advance and superiority? Or do we need to just sustain ourselves and live in harmony with the environment?

    Humans (us) tend to think that progressive development is the advancement of life but look at our actions so far. Solution to one environmental problem is giving birth to multiple negative impacts caused to our mother earth.

    Living to sustain ourselves and the mother would be the better way, I think. Forget about all advancement and economic superiority, these are causing more damage.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to the Economics of Happiness Blog

Sign up for our email updates

Latest Blogs

  • Progress and the modernization of Ladakh

    December 18, 20202 Comments
  • How the World Bank helped re-establish colonial plantations

    December 2, 20202 Comments
  • Making the Case for a Small Farm Future

    November 26, 20201 Comment
  • How Industrial Food Makes Us More Vulnerable to COVID-19

    November 4, 20201 Comment
  • Lockdown in Ladakh

    October 8, 20201 Comment
  • What to Do When the World is on Fire

    September 24, 20209 Comments

Blog posts by Category

  • Capitalism (2)
  • Climate Change (39)
  • Community (26)
  • Consumerism (2)
  • Coronavirus (15)
  • Democracy (3)
  • Development (20)
  • Economic Growth and Degrowth (30)
  • Economics of Happiness Conferences (4)
  • Education (7)
  • Environment (27)
  • Food and Farming (53)
  • Free Trade and Globalization (38)
  • Happiness (2)
  • Health (21)
  • Indigenous worldview (13)
  • Inequality (5)
  • Inner transformation (13)
  • Livelihoods and jobs (33)
  • Local energy (7)
  • Local finance (4)
  • Localization (43)
  • New economy (17)
  • Resistance and Renewal (15)
  • Technology (26)
  • The Economics of Happiness (15)
  • Uncategorized (3)
  • About
  • Contact
  • The Economics of Happiness
  • Learn & Take Action

Sign up for our email updates

Donate Now

International Society for Ecology and Culture © Copyright 2021 | site by digiflip
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok